Gardner Magazine Editorial: Proposed Chief of Staff Title is Silly. Title should reflect role “Director of Facilities and Communications.”
Editorial – Proposed Chief of Staff Title is Silly
The Gardner City Council on Monday June 1st is poised to accept the new “Chief of Staff” title and position proposed by the Mayor to replace the Executive Aide position albeit at a higher salary. While we often report on what we think are awesome ideas, this one gets a complete thumbs down from Gardner Magazine. In a nutshell, the title is silly and a mistake. If the intent is to oversee Facilities and Communications, then by all means, give it that title: Director of Facilities and Communications. That way a “Chief of Staff” title does not undermine the authority of future Mayors, lead to any confusion, or allow future Mayors to simply be lazy in the role and allow a “Chief of Staff” to rule the roost.
Hands down “NO” to Chief of Staff. Change the title to match what the position actually is and the change will yield a much better result in the long run. The Mayor doesn’t need a “Chief of Staff”. The Mayor is the Chief of Staff and should function as such and keep his eye on the ball. And just because other cities and towns have a Chief of Staff doesn’t make it right. They after all are not the “Model City for America.” We hope the Gardner City Council catches the proposed error before it becomes reality.