City Council Gardner MA

---

---

---

The legislative oversight paid off across multiple categories. The new budget process allowed the Mayor to adjust his budget after receiving feedback in the Committee of the Whole reviews and the Council held an organized and focused debate on submitted amendments. This resulted in successfully trimmed underutilized funding, including excess office supplies and Mass Municipal Association dues, allowing for reallocating resources into more critical municipal services. In total, Council feedback reduced spending by more than $2 million from the beginning of the process. 

Good Projects Deserve Good Process: Building Confidence, Not Just Buildings
In a unanimous vote, the Council approved an appropriation to fund extensive enhancements to the Gardner High School C-Wing. Though the initial project approved last year was scoped strictly as a $2 million locker room replacement, it evolved during the design phase into a massive renovation encompassing upgraded team rooms, office spaces, public restrooms, and a reconfigured gym wing designed to extend the high school’s structural life for decades.

While the project itself is a vital investment for Gardner’s students and athletes, the lack of timely transparency from the executive office left the Council on an incredibly tight decision window, with very little time to evaluate the expansion. 

Moving forward, the Council made it clear that “engineered timelines” that force votes at the eleventh hour must stop, demanding a holistic, collaborative approach to capital improvement planning between the administration, the City Council, and the School Committee.

June Wrapped Up

Holding Accountability: The Council officially launched a formal investigation under Section 25 of the City Charter following a sophisticated cyber fraud incident where an external scammer successfully diverted $40,000 in public funds. While the treasury acted swiftly to ensure the city will likely be made whole, a counselor will formally review cross-departmental vendor onboarding processes to eliminate internal vulnerabilities. Additionally, the Council invoked Section 25 to audit the Building Department following a recent discovery by the City Auditor that mandatory financial checks and assessor reviews were being bypassed on building permits.

Swearing in the New Clerk: Following a transparent and comprehensive search process that brought in 49 applicants, the Special Search Committee unanimously nominated Atty. Jennifer Pelavin to the office of City Clerk. In a unanimous 9-0 roll call vote, the Council officially elected and swore in Atty. Pelavin to a three-year term beginning July 6, 2026, ensuring a smooth transition for City Hall’s primary administrative artery.

Closing Out Fiscal Year Accounts: To ensure a clean slate before the June 30th deadline, the Council voted to approve essential end-of-year transfers. This included fully funding the snow and ice deficit with $573,186 from free cash, allocating $285,820 to police department overtime, and utilizing salary vacancies to clear $100,000 for emergency leachate pump repairs at the city’s closed solid waste landfill.

See you all next month!

George

---

This session was not merely a formality; it was a masterclass in how administrative precision ensures the city’s legal and financial machinery remains in perfect alignment.

The “Double-Check” Standard: Why Multiple Reports Matter

The meeting opened with the swift approval of the minutes from April 27, 2026, before transitioning into a review of the June 2026 motor vehicle abatements. To the uninitiated, signing off on tax abatements might seem like a clerical footnote. However, the board’s workflow reveals a sophisticated commitment to data integrity through redundancy.

The board reviewed multiple reports to ensure that the total abatement figures were consistent across all datasets. This process is not just for internal peace of mind; it is a critical intersection between the Assessors and the City Auditor. The board specifically noted that while multiple reports are run for verification, not every copy requires a signature—only the primary report destined for the Auditor’s office. This ensures a clean paper trail for the city’s financial oversight while maintaining a secondary “check” system to prevent clerical errors before they reach the general ledger.

“What’s great about having multiple reports you can run more than one and make sure your numbers [match].”

The Seasonal Pivot: Why ‘Involved’ Exemption Work Demands More Than Routine Scrutiny

Municipal governance is a cyclical endeavor, and this July meeting marked a clear transition point in the fiscal calendar. As the board finalized the routine motor vehicle abatements from the previous month, they prepared for the shift toward more complex territory: statutory exemptions.

While motor vehicle abatements are often high-volume and standardized, the upcoming focus on exemptions represents a more “involved” phase of work. For the board, this means a shift from data verification to the nuanced evaluation of individual applications. This seasonal pivot requires a higher level of scrutiny, as exemptions directly impact the city’s tax base and require strict adherence to eligibility criteria. The transition from the “routine” to the “involved” is where the expertise of the board is most tested, moving from broad oversight to the detailed vetting of personal and financial qualifications.

Behind Closed Doors: The Legal Weight of “Chapter Land”

As the clock neared 11:04 a.m., the board moved into an executive session, a transition that highlights the delicate balance between government transparency and the privacy of individual property data. Invoking the motion as stated—under Mass General Law Chapter 3A, section 21A7—the board shifted focus to a specific discussion regarding “Chapter land on Smith Street.”

From an analyst’s perspective, the mention of “Chapter land” refers to properties classified under MGL Chapters 61, 61A, or 61B. These laws provide tax incentives for land used for forestry, agriculture, or recreation. Because discussions regarding these classifications often involve sensitive financial data, usage commitments, and personal property details, the law mandates a move from open session to a private, legally protected session. By adjourning the open meeting to address the Smith Street property in executive session, the board demonstrated a disciplined adherence to the legal protocols that protect both the taxpayer’s privacy and the city’s statutory obligations.

The Efficiency of Oversight

The transition from the public review of abatements to the private scrutiny of land use was handled with the same brisk efficiency that defined the start of the meeting. By 11:04 a.m., the Gardner Board of Assessors had approved past minutes, verified the Auditor’s abatement reports, and moved into a legally mandated session for sensitive land classification.

This brevity is not a sign of a lack of depth; rather, it is the byproduct of prepared oversight. When the data is verified and the legal authorities are clearly understood, the machinery of government can move with surgical speed. It prompts a vital question for the modern citizen: How often do we consider the administrative precision and the quiet, three-minute increments of labor required to keep our own cities running smoothly? The most critical work of a municipality is often finalized not in the heat of a public forum, but in the focused silence of a room where the numbers must always match. Kudos to Assessor Christine Kumar and member Paulette Burns for their diligent work.

---

The Council ratified the step designation for the new City Clerk, Jennifer Pelavin, who began her first day of service on the date of the meeting.

• Step Designation: The Council approved setting the Clerk’s pay to Step 1.
• Experience Credit: Despite having over 20 years of experience as an attorney and in municipal roles, she was credited with 4.5 years of experience under the current system (which allows for a maximum of 10 years).
• Fiscal Impact: Counselor Mack noted that the difference on the step scale for this designation is $1,579.

Special Municipal Employee Designation

The Council designated the position of Transfer Station Safety Program Development and Compliance Coordinator as a “special municipal employee” under MGL Chapter 268A.

• Purpose: This allows Mr. Babin of the Health Department to hold two roles within the city simultaneously.
• Rationale: The roles do not conflict, as the inspector duties occur during the week while the transfer station coordinator role takes place on weekends.

---

Open Meeting Law Complaints

The Council addressed two complaints (Items 11878 and 11879) filed by Paul DeMeo regarding the June 15, 2026, meeting. The Council authorized the President to respond that no violations occurred.

• Context: One complaint pertained to a National Grid petition.
• Council Defense: Counselor Mack clarified that National Grid changed its request from a joint relocation to a new installation of poles mid-process. The company was instructed to submit a new request and attend a subsequent meeting, which they failed to do. The Council maintained that because the process remains pending under Rule 22, no violation has taken place. Another public hearing will be scheduled.
• Context: 2nd complaint pertained to the procedure regarding the election of the City Clerk
• Council Defense: Motion was simply to respond that no open meeting law violations had occurred.
• Council Action: Unanimous vote on both complaints to respond that no Open Meeting Law violations had occurred.

Hazard Mitigation Plan:Item 11836, regarding the adoption of the city’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, was referred back to the Finance Committee for further study and reporting.

---

Waterford Community Center Upgrades:The Council approved a measure allowing Growing Places LLC to make specific changes to the Waterford Community Center per their lease agreement.

• Authorized Changes: Installation of a backup generator and two 3-square-foot condensers on the kitchen roof.
• Justification: These upgrades are essential for maintaining refrigeration and ensuring the continuity of the organization’s mission during power outages.

Greenwood Memorial Pool Signage Dispute: A proposed transfer of $4,116 from the City Council salary and wages account to fund signage for the Greenwood Memorial Pool (Item 11877) was withdrawn and referred back to committee after debate.

Point of Discussion	Details
Historical Value	The pool is a 111-year-old gift from the Greenwood and Heywood families.
Funding Source	Unused FY26 City Council salary funds, which must be allocated by August or they revert to free cash.
Opposition	Counselors Dernolowicz and Kazinskas expressed concerns about “rushing” the signage in the middle of the season and preferred to wait until the new pavilion was complete.
Alternatives	There were inquiries regarding local options like Monty Tech or grant funding, though the latter was confirmed to be unavailable.

---

Non-Union Compensation Rubric: The Council passed a roll-call vote (9-0) to transfer $205,127.80 from the Mayor’s unclassified salary reserve to various salary accounts.

• Objective: To fund the new non-union compensation rubric previously passed by the Council.
• Implementation: The transfer covers multiple line items and positions as detailed in the budget chart provided by the Mayor.

Animal Control Services: The Council authorized an Intermunicipal Agreement (IMA) with the Town of Hubbardston for animal control services.

• Term: July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029.
• Correction: While the initial packet contained incorrect dates, the Finance Committee reviewed and approved a corrected version provided by the Mayor.

---

Key Quotes

“The Greenwood Pool is… a 111-year-old gift to the city from the Greenwood and Heywood families… the current design [of the new pavilion] does not have any plan for signage… we need to preserve the initial intent of the remaining outdoor pool.” — Counselor Mack on the importance of signage.

“I have concerns about running towards this right now… this money will then fall into free cash. It could be expended later… I would like more time myself to look at other options.” — Counselor Dernolowitz on the signage funding transfer.

“I too… would like to welcome our new clerk and just as we have done and said and demanded of other departments to improve process, procedure, and documentation, she also has a long road ahead of her to look at improvements.” — President Tyros on the expectations for the new City Clerk.

---

Formal shift in strategy for obstruction management:, Moving away from Runway 36 due to forestry division challenges and focusing instead on Runway 18. The Commission reviewed a revised scope of work for Phase 1 navigation easement acquisitions involving six parcels. A critical procedural step involves an Independent Fee Estimate (IFE) to validate project costs, estimated at approximately $405,000, to ensure 95% reimbursement through federal and state grants. Finalizing these easements is a prerequisite for FAA-funded tree removal.

Gardner Magazine has prepared 4 separate infographics intended to illustrate the complexities involved in the airport runway issues. 1. Glossary for the Runway 18 Project 2. Project Scope Statement 3. Meeting Briefing 4. Runway 18 – $405,000 Paperwork

---

---

---

The CDBG program in Gardner is currently managing a complex transition between the closeout of FY22/23 projects and the commencement of FY24 and FY25 initiatives. Key highlights include the successful conclusion of the Greenwood Pool demolition, allowing the facility to reopen for the season, and the awarding of the base bid for the new Greenwood Pavilion. Financial and regulatory hurdles remain for specific projects, notably the Waterford Street Community Center—which faces strict federal benefit requirements—and the St. Paul’s Episcopal Church Community Garden expansion, which requires rigorous adherence to accessibility and labor standards. Administratively, the department is preparing for a leadership transition following the departure of the Assistant Director and the Conservation Agent. The Assistant Director was “scouted” by another community and the Conservation Agent is going back to school for his MBA.

The Economic and Community Development Committee meeting held on June 24, 2026, highlighted a period of significant transition and strategic milestone achievement for the City of Gardner. Key developments include the successful adoption of foundational planning documents—the Master Plan, Housing Production Plan, and Municipal Surplus Property Plan—which now provide a unified roadmap for the city’s growth. The Hazard Mitigation Plan is currently awaiting FEMA approval and was granted an extension until October 1st.

The city has secured substantial funding for major infrastructure, most notably a $2 million-plus grant from MassDOT for the Keyes Road Culvert replacement and a Mass Trails grant for the North Central Pathway Phase 2. Renovations at the Waterford Street Community Center face a temporary delay due to the discovery of asbestos-containing tiles in the two-story wing and a state-level accessibility review. Despite these hurdles, the city’s housing analysis confirms a robust demand for at least 250 new units over the next five years, supported by a low rental vacancy rate of 1% to 2%.

---