Gardner Magazine published a previous article on this regarding “Complaint Xeroxing”. CLICK HERE.
City Councilor Judy Mack Responds to DeMeo OML Complaints in Spirited Statement
In a special City Council Meeting on July 31, 2024, Gardner City Councilors voted to send the response drafted by Assistant City Solicitor Vincent Pusiteri to the 14 Open Meeting Law Complaints filed by Paul DeMeo on behalf of himself and 13 others. Listen to the meeting on any device, CLICK PLAY.
Councilor George Tyros read the complaint stating, “I read this complaint because I don’t believe this is the way we should talk and work with each other as a community. We’re better than this. I’ve also received many positive instances of feedback and how those meetings were held that the business conducted in this room was able to be clear concise and efficient and the overflow room was adequate and residents were able to watch the meeting live. This seems like a difference of opinions and a difference of opinions is not a violation of the open meeting law.”
Councilor Judy Mack had a lengthy statement in which she called out Paul DeMeo stating, “Vindictiveness is nothing but slanderous defamation, harassment, and slander“
Here is the complete statement made by Councilor Judy Mack “I just want to as this is the last item on our agenda. I just want to again discuss the purpose of the open meeting law is to ensure transparency and the deliberations on which public policy is based because the democratic process depends on the public having knowledge about the considerations underlying government action. The open meeting law requires with some exceptions that meetings of public bodies be open to the public. It also seeks to balance the public’s interest in witnessing the deliberations of public officials with the government’s need to manage its operations efficiently. Based on this, the open meeting law complaints filed are unfounded. Did anyone look up the 48-page open meeting law guide and read it to determine if there was any evidence of a violation before taking someone else’s word? The person who first complained wasn’t happy that he didn’t get his way when he emailed demanding the council president relocate the public hearing. So in his childish way, he resorts to filing a complaint with no merit. If you were in the auditorium, did you bring up any concerns at the time? I recall some of you who filed weren’t even seated in the auditorium on July 1st. For those of you who decided to believe this was a valid complaint and allow a photo copy of someone else’s complaint to be submitted to the city clerk with your name on it, I urge you in the future to think for yourself and do your own research. Don’t get misled by one person’s influence and perspective. He will take any opportunity to complain against the city and the city council, whether it be an open meeting law violation or a public records request. These laws were not put in place to be misused by a person with a personal grievance, but for valid reasons of accountability. He constantly copies the news media and the attorney general’s office in an attempt to get his way. As a person who is not even a registered voter in the city, he makes it his mission to spread conspiracy theories and false information to others. His shameful actions, false statements, and lies know no bounds. These insults and accusations he hurls are beyond egregious and disgraceful. Civil discourse is natural in politics. I value the opinion and insight of those who truly care for this city, and the people who can make their point without it being full of bias. I implore everyone, please ask yourself, what is the truth behind nonstop defamatory statements and one-sided rhetoric on social media? Don’t continue to be swayed by one person whose vindictiveness is nothing but slanderous defamation, harassment, and slander. Please continue to care and be involved in your city, but be your own advocate. Be your own person.”