How important is this issue?
Kamuda Candidate for City Council AUDIO Interview: 10,887 listens as of 8/29/23
Mayor Nicholson 8-11-23 AUDIO Update: 8,548 listens as of 8/29/23
3 Years Mayor Nicholson AUDIO interview: 4,101 listens as of 8/29/23
Bay State Racing AUDIO Interview: 3,888 listens as of 8/29/23
These numbers include listens from August 2023 only. Based on our records from the past 2 years, this issue is a very important one for both those in favor and opposed. Our pages and articles regarding the issue and anything related have received a high amount of traffic.
Editorial – The Ethics of Transparency Playing Out in Gardner MA
On August 29, 2023, this Publisher did not hesitate to call out the CEO of a local business organization when the information imparted to us was not accurate or fair to a member business. This is the role of a trusted publication like Gardner Magazine. We try to tell it like it is. Unfortunately, that sometimes ruffles some feathers.
Local Land – Zoning Issue
I’m writing this at 4:20am on August 30, 2023 . I woke up really troubled by another example of the ethics of transparency. The citizens of Gardner are awaiting information regarding a local land issue. The same business impacted above wants to build in Gardner and is spending money towards that effort. At the same time, citizens opposed are spending money making lawn signs, creating graphics, and taking time away from friends and family on an issue which concerns them.
What if the outcome is known? What if there is information given to City Officials which would immediately settle the issue, one way or the other? We say the ethics of transparency call for immediate disclosure to the public. No waiting until the next City Council meeting even if its only a few days away. No waiting until the next Planning Board meeting even if its only a couple weeks away. The Ethics of Transparency call for immediate disclosure, even if it’s not convenient. Disclosure is not a choice, it’s an obligation. And we urge that obligation be taken seriously without deliberation and without consideration of what timing would be best. True and pure transparency does not a jury need – it only needs to value the public’s right to know more than personal convenience.
Werner Poegel, Publisher.